From his father, from his grandfather that he said: "I ate bustard meat with the Messenger of Allah (saws)."
[Abu 'Eisa said:] This Hadith is Gharib, we do not know of it except from this route. Ibn Abi Fudaik reported from Ibrahim bin 'Umar bin Safinah and he has been called Buraih bin 'Umar bin Safinah.
| Grade: | Da'if (Darussalam) |
| Reference | : Jami` at-Tirmidhi 1828 |
| In-book reference | : Book 25, Hadith 44 |
| English translation | : Vol. 3, Book 23, Hadith 1828 |
That the Messenger of Allah (saws) said: "Let one of you not consider any good to be insignificant. If he has nothing, then let him meet his brother with a smiling face. If you buy some meat or cook something in a pot, then increase its broth, and serve some of it to your neighbor."
[Abu 'Eisa said:] This Hadith is Hasan Sahih. Shu'bah reported it from Abu 'Imran Al-Jawni.
| Grade: | Sahih (Darussalam) |
| Reference | : Jami` at-Tirmidhi 1833 |
| In-book reference | : Book 25, Hadith 49 |
| English translation | : Vol. 3, Book 23, Hadith 1833 |
"Indeed Khamr comes from wheat."
[After mentioning this, he said:] and this is more correct than the narration of Ibrahim bin Muhajir (no. 1872). 'Ali bin Al-Madini said: "Yahya bin Sa'eed said: 'Ibrahim bin Al-Muhajir is not strong [in Hadith].'" And it has also been reported through other rotes from Ash-Sha'bi, from An-Nu'man bin Bashir.
| Grade: | Sahih (Darussalam) |
| Reference | : Jami` at-Tirmidhi 1874 |
| In-book reference | : Book 26, Hadith 14 |
| English translation | : Vol. 3, Book 24, Hadith 1874 |
From Abu Hurairah who said: "The price of a dog was prohibited, except for the hunting dog."
[Abu 'Eisa said:] This Hadith is not correct from this route. Abu Al-Muhazzim's name is Yazid bin Sufyan, and Shu'bah bin Al-Hajjaj criticized him and graded him weak. Similar to this has been reported from Jabir, from the Prophet (saws), but its chain is also not correct.
| Grade: | Da'if (Darussalam) |
| Reference | : Jami` at-Tirmidhi 1281 |
| In-book reference | : Book 14, Hadith 83 |
| English translation | : Vol. 1, Book 12, Hadith 1281 |
| Grade: | Sahih (Darussalam) |
| Reference | : Jami` at-Tirmidhi 3359 |
| In-book reference | : Book 47, Hadith 411 |
| English translation | : Vol. 5, Book 44, Hadith 3359 |
| Grade: | Da'if (Darussalam) |
| Reference | : Jami` at-Tirmidhi 2678 |
| In-book reference | : Book 41, Hadith 34 |
| English translation | : Vol. 5, Book 39, Hadith 2678 |
| Grade: | Hasan (Darussalam) |
| Reference | : Jami` at-Tirmidhi 2803 |
| In-book reference | : Book 43, Hadith 76 |
| English translation | : Vol. 5, Book 41, Hadith 2803 |
| Grade: | Da'if (Darussalam) |
| Reference | : Jami` at-Tirmidhi 3718 |
| In-book reference | : Book 49, Hadith 115 |
| English translation | : Vol. 1, Book 46, Hadith 3718 |
| Grade: | Sahih (Darussalam) |
| Reference | : Jami` at-Tirmidhi 3745 |
| In-book reference | : Book 49, Hadith 142 |
| English translation | : Vol. 1, Book 46, Hadith 3745 |
| Grade: | Sahih (Darussalam) |
| Reference | : Jami` at-Tirmidhi 3911 |
| In-book reference | : Book 49, Hadith 311 |
| English translation | : Vol. 1, Book 46, Hadith 3911 |
[Muslim].
| Reference | : Riyad as-Salihin 128 |
| In-book reference | : Introduction, Hadith 128 |
[Al- Bukhari and Muslim].
| Reference | : Riyad as-Salihin 325 |
| In-book reference | : Introduction, Hadith 325 |
[Muslim].
| Reference | : Riyad as-Salihin 404 |
| In-book reference | : Introduction, Hadith 404 |
[Abu Dawud].
| Reference | : Riyad as-Salihin 629 |
| In-book reference | : Introduction, Hadith 629 |
[Al-Bukhari and Muslim].
قَوْلَهَا:"فَتَمرَّقَ"هو بالرَّاءِ، ومعناهُ: انْتثر وَسَقَطَ،"والْوَاصِلة": التي تَصِلُ شَعْرهَا، أو شَعْر غَيْرِهَا بشَعْرٍ آخَرَ."والمَوْصُولة": التي يُوصَلُ شَعْرُهَا. "والمُستَوصِلَةُ": التي تَسْأَلُ منْ يَفْعَلُ ذلكَ لَهَا.
| Reference | : Riyad as-Salihin 1642 |
| In-book reference | : Book 17, Hadith 132 |
Another narration is: "These are garments of the disbelievers. So do not wear them."
[Muslim].
وفي رواية فقال: "إن هذا من ثياب الكفار فلا تلبسها" ((رواه مسلم)).
| Reference | : Riyad as-Salihin 1799 |
| In-book reference | : Book 17, Hadith 289 |
| Grade: | Hasan (Darussalam) |
| Reference | : Musnad Ahmad 96 |
| In-book reference | : Book 2, Hadith 15 |
| Grade: | Hasan (Darussalam)] (Darussalam) |
| Reference | : Musnad Ahmad 680 |
| In-book reference | : Book 5, Hadith 113 |
| Grade: | Sahih (Darussalam)] (Darussalam) |
| Reference | : Musnad Ahmad 1090 |
| In-book reference | : Book 5, Hadith 507 |
| Grade: | Hasan (Darussalam)] (Darussalam) |
| Reference | : Musnad Ahmad 1157 |
| In-book reference | : Book 5, Hadith 570 |
حَدَّثَنَا عَبْد اللَّهِ قَالَ و حَدَّثَنِي أَبُو خَيْثَمَةَ حَدَّثَنَا حَبَّانُ بْنُ هِلَالٍ حَدَّثَنَا جَعْفَرٌ فَذَكَرَ مِثْلَهُ نَحْوَهُ.
| Grade: | Da'if (Darussalam) because Utaibah and Buraid bin Asram is unknown], Da\'if (Darussalam) like the previous report] (Darussalam) |
| Reference | : Musnad Ahmad 1155, 1156 |
| In-book reference | : Book 5, Hadith 569 |
| Grade: | Muttafaqun 'alayh (Zubair `Aliza'i) | مُتَّفَقٌ عَلَيْهِ (الألباني) | حكم : |
| متفق عليه (زبیر علی زئی) |
| Reference | : Mishkat al-Masabih 52 |
| In-book reference | : Book 1, Hadith 47 |
| حسن (الألباني) | حكم : |
| Reference | : Mishkat al-Masabih 373 |
| In-book reference | : Book 3, Hadith 83 |
| حسن (الألباني) | حكم : |
| Reference | : Mishkat al-Masabih 417 |
| In-book reference | : Book 3, Hadith 122 |
| صَحِيح (الألباني) | حكم : |
| Reference | : Mishkat al-Masabih 560 |
| In-book reference | : Book 3, Hadith 256 |
| ضَعِيف (الألباني) | حكم : |
| Reference | : Mishkat al-Masabih 1737 |
| In-book reference | : Book 5, Hadith 209 |
| حَسَنٍ (الألباني) | حكم : |
| Reference | : Mishkat al-Masabih 1567 |
| In-book reference | : Book 5, Hadith 45 |
| لم تتمّ دراسته (الألباني) | حكم : |
| Reference | : Mishkat al-Masabih 3108 |
| In-book reference | : Book 13, Hadith 29 |
| حسن (الألباني) | حكم : |
| Reference | : Mishkat al-Masabih 3117 |
| In-book reference | : Book 13, Hadith 38 |
| لم تتمّ دراسته (الألباني) | حكم : |
| Reference | : Mishkat al-Masabih 3138 |
| In-book reference | : Book 13, Hadith 58 |
| لم تتمّ دراسته (الألباني) | حكم : |
| Reference | : Mishkat al-Masabih 3336 |
| In-book reference | : Book 13, Hadith 250 |
| لم تتمّ دراسته (الألباني) | حكم : |
| Reference | : Mishkat al-Masabih 3781 |
| In-book reference | : Book 18, Hadith 116 |
| ضَعِيف (الألباني) | حكم : |
| Reference | : Mishkat al-Masabih 2407 |
| In-book reference | : Book 9, Hadith 177 |
| لم تتمّ دراسته (الألباني) | حكم : |
| Reference | : Mishkat al-Masabih 3632 |
| In-book reference | : Book 17, Hadith 69 |
| صَحِيح (الألباني) | حكم : |
| Reference | : Mishkat al-Masabih 1315 |
| In-book reference | : Book 4, Hadith 724 |
| ضَعِيف (الألباني) | حكم : |
| Reference | : Mishkat al-Masabih 1476 |
| In-book reference | : Book 4, Hadith 876 |
| حسن (الألباني) | حكم : |
| Reference | : Mishkat al-Masabih 4350 |
| In-book reference | : Book 22, Hadith 41 |
| حسن (الألباني) | حكم : |
| Reference | : Mishkat al-Masabih 4156 |
| In-book reference | : Book 20, Hadith 91 |
| مُتَّفَقٌ عَلَيْهِ (الألباني) | حكم : |
| Reference | : Mishkat al-Masabih 4611 |
| In-book reference | : Book 24, Hadith 5 |
| صَحِيح (الألباني) | حكم : |
| Reference | : Mishkat al-Masabih 3877 |
| In-book reference | : Book 19, Hadith 89 |
| مُتَّفَقٌ عَلَيْهِ (الألباني) | حكم : |
| Reference | : Mishkat al-Masabih 3945 |
| In-book reference | : Book 19, Hadith 157 |
| Reference | : Mishkat al-Masabih 5641 |
| In-book reference | : Book 28, Hadith 113 |
| Reference | : Mishkat al-Masabih 5819 |
| In-book reference | : Book 29, Hadith 79 |
| Grade: | Sahih (Darussalam) |
| Reference | : Sunan an-Nasa'i 897 |
| In-book reference | : Book 11, Hadith 22 |
| English translation | : Vol. 2, Book 11, Hadith 898 |
| Grade: | Sahih (Darussalam) |
| Reference | : Sunan an-Nasa'i 1064 |
| In-book reference | : Book 12, Hadith 36 |
| English translation | : Vol. 2, Book 12, Hadith 1065 |
| Grade: | Sahih (Darussalam) |
| Reference | : Sunan an-Nasa'i 3552 |
| In-book reference | : Book 27, Hadith 166 |
| English translation | : Vol. 4, Book 27, Hadith 3582 |
| Grade: | Sahih (Darussalam) |
| Reference | : Sunan an-Nasa'i 731 |
| In-book reference | : Book 8, Hadith 44 |
| English translation | : Vol. 1, Book 8, Hadith 732 |
Malik related to me that he heard that Abu Salama ibn Abd ar- Rahman and Sulayman ibn Yasar were both asked, "Does one pronounce judgement on the basis of an oath with one witness?" They both said, "Yes."
Malik said, "The precedent of the sunna in judging by an oath with one witness is that if the plaintiff takes an oath with his witness, he is confirmed in his right. If he draws back and refuses to take an oath, the defendant is made to take an oath. If he takes an oath, the claim against him is dropped. If he refuses to take an oath, the claim is confirmed against him."
Malik said, "This procedure pertains to property cases in particular. It does not occur in any of the hadd-punishments, nor in marriage, divorce, freeing slaves, theft or slander. If some one says, 'Freeing slaves comes under property,' he has erred. It is not as he said. Had it been as he said, a slave could take an oath with one witness, if he could find one, that his master had freed him.
"However, when a slave lays claim to a piece of property, he can take an oath with one witness and demand his right as the freeman demands his right."
Malik said, "The sunna with us is that when a slave brings somebody who witnesses that he has been set free, his master is made to take an oath that he has not freed him, and the slave's claim is dropped."
Malik said, "The sunna about divorce is also like that with us. When a woman brings somebody who witnesses that her husband has divorced her, the husband is made to take an oath that he has not divorced her. If he takes the oath, the divorce does not proceed . "
Malik said, "There is only one sunna of bringing a witness in cases of divorce and freeing a slave. The right to make an oath only belongs to the husband of the woman, and the master of the slave. Freeing is a hadd matter, and the testimony of women is not permitted in it because when a slave is freed, his inviolability is affirmed and the hadd punishments are applied for and against him. If he commits fornication and he is a muhsan, he is stoned. If he kills a slave, he is killed for it. Inheritance is established for him, between him and whoever inherits from him. If somebody disputes this, arguing that if a man frees his slave and then a man comes to demand from the master of the slave payment of a debt, and a man and two women testify to his right, that establishes the right against the master of the slave so that his freeing him is cancelled if he only has the slave as property, inferring by this case that the testimony of women is permitted in cases of setting free. The case is not as he suggests (i.e. it is a case of property not freeing). It is like a man who frees his slave, and then the claimant of a debt comes to the master and takes an oath with one witness, demanding his right. By that, the freeing of the slave would be cancelled. Or else a man comes who has frequent dealings and transactions with the master of the slave. He claims that he is owed money by the master of the slave. Someone says to the master of the slave, 'Take an oath that you don't owe what he claims'. If he draws back and refuses to take an oath, the one making the claim takes an oath and his right against the master of the slave is confirmed. That would cancel the freeing of the slave if it is confirmed that property is owed by the master."
Malik said, "It is the same case with a man who marries a slave-girl and then the master of the slave-girl comes to the man who has married her and claims, 'You and so-and-so have bought my slave-girl from me for such an amount of dinars. The husband of the slave-girl denies that. The master of the slave-girl brings a man and two women and they testify to what he has said. The sale is confirmed and his claim is considered true. So the slave-girl is haram for her husband and they have to separate, even though the testimony of women is not accepted in divorce."
Malik said, "It is also the same case with a man who accuses a free man, so the hadd falls on him. A man and two women come and testify that the one accused is a slave. That would remove the hadd from the accused after it had befallen him, even though the testimony of women is not accepted in accusations involving hadd punishments."
Malik said, "Another similar case in which judgement appears to go against the precedent of the sunna is that two women testify that a child is born alive and so it is necessary for him to inherit if a situation arises where he is entitled to inherit, and the child's property goes to those who inherit from him, if he dies, and it is not necessary that the two women witnesses should be accompanied by a man or an oath even though it may involve vast properties of gold, silver, live-stock, gardens and slaves and other properties. However, had two women testified to one dirham or more or less than that in a property case, their testimony would not affect anything and would not be permitted unless there was a witness or an oath with them."
Malik said, "There are people who say that an oath is not acceptable with only one witness and they argue by the word of Allah the Blessed, the Exalted, and His word is the Truth, 'And call in to witness two witnesses, men; or if the two be not men, then one man and two women, such witnesses as you approve of.' (Sura 2 ayat 282). Such people argue that if he does not bring one man and two women, he has no claim and he is not allowed to take an oath with one witness."
Malik said, "Part of the proof against those who argue this, is to reply to them, 'Do you think that if a man claimed property from a man, the one claimed from would not swear that the claim was false?' If he swears, the claim against him is dropped. If he refuses to take an oath, the claimant is made to take an oath that his claim is true, and his right against his companion is established. There is no dispute about this with any of the people nor in any country. By what does he take this? In what place in the Book of Allah does he find it? So if he confirms this, let him confirm the oath with one witness, even if it is not in the Book of Allah, the Mighty, the Majestic! It is enough that this is the precedent of the sunna. However, man wants to recognise the proper course of action and the location of the proof. In this there is a clarification for what is obscure about that, if Allah ta'ala wills."
| USC-MSA web (English) reference | : Book 36, Hadith 7 |
| Arabic reference | : Book 36, Hadith 1411 |
Malik related to me from Humayd ibn Qays al-Makki that a son of al-Mutawakkil had a mukatab who died at Makka and left (enough to pay) the rest of his kitaba and he owed some debts to people. He also left a daughter. The governor of Makka was not certain about how to judge in the case, so he wrote to Abd al-Malik ibn Marwan to ask him about it. Abd al-Malik wrote to him, "Begin with the debts owed to people, and then pay what remains of his kitaba. Then divide what remains of the property between the daughter and the master."
Malik said, "What is done among us is that the master of a slave does not have to give his slave a kitaba if he asks for it. I have not heard of any of the Imams forcing a man to give a kitaba to his slave. I heard that one of the people of knowledge, when someone asked about that and mentioned that Allah the Blessed, the Exalted, said, 'Give them their kitaba, if you know some good in them' (Sura 24 ayat 33) recited these two ayats, 'When you are free of the state of ihram, then hunt for game.' (Sura 5 ayat 3) 'When the prayer is finished, scatter in the land and seek Allah's favour.' " (Sura 62 ayat 10)
Malik commented, "It is a way of doing things for which Allah, the Mighty, the Majestic, has given permission to people, and it is not obligatory for them." Malik said, "I heard one of the people of knowledge say about the word of Allah, the Blessed, the Exalted, 'Give them of the wealth which Allah has given you,' that it meant that a man give his slave a kitaba and then reduce the end of his kitaba for him by some specific amount."
Malik said, "This is what I have heard from the people of knowledge and what I see people doing here."
Malik said, "I have heard that Abdullah ibn Umar gave one of his slaves his kitaba for 35,000 dirhams, and then reduced the end of his kitaba by 5,000 dirhams."
Malik said, "What is done among us is that when a master gives a mukatab his kitaba, the mukatab's property goes with him but his children do not go with him unless he stipulates that in his kitaba."
Yahya said, "I heard Malik say that if a mukatab whose master had given him a kitaba had a slave- girl who was pregnant by him, and neither he nor his master knew that on the day he was given his kitaba, the child did not follow him because he was not included in the kitaba. He belonged to the master. As for the slave-girl, she belonged to the mukatab because she was his property."
Malik said that if a man and his wife's son (by another husband) inherited a mukatab from the wife and the mukatab died before he had completed his kitaba, they divided his inheritance between them according to the Book of Allah. If the slave paid his kitaba and then died, his inheritance went to the son of the woman, and the husband had nothing of his inheritance.
Malik said that if a mukatab gave his own slave a kitaba, the situation was looked at. If he wanted to do his slave a favour and it was obvious by his making it easy for him, that was not permitted. If he was giving him a kitaba from desire to find money to pay off his own kitaba, that was permitted for him.
Malik said that if a man had intercourse with a mukataba of his and she became pregnant by him, she had an option. If she liked she could be an umm walad. If she wished, she could confirm her kitaba. If she did not conceive, she still had her kitaba.
Malik said, "The generally agreed on way of doing things among us about a slave who is owned by two men is that one of them does not give a kitaba for his share, whether or not his companion gives him permission to do so, unless they both write the kitaba together, because that alone would effect setting him free. If the slave were to fulfil what he had agreed on to free half of himself, and then the one who had given a kitaba for half of him was not obliged to complete his setting free, that would be in opposition to the words of the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace. 'If someone frees his share in a slave and has enough money to cover the full price of the slave, justly evaluated for him, he must give his partners their shares, so the slave is completely free . ' "
Malik said, "If he is not aware of that until the mukatab has met the terms or before he has met them the owner who has written him the kitaba returns what he has taken from the mukatab to him, and then he and his partner divide him according to their original shares and the kitaba is invalid. He is the slave of both of them in his original state."
Malik spoke about a mukatab who was owned by two men and one of them granted him a delay in the payment of the right which he was owed, and the other refused to defer it, and so the one who refused to defer the payment exacted his part of the due. Malik said that if the mukatab then died and left property which did not complete his kitaba, "They divide it according to what they are still owed by him. Each of them takes according to his share. If the mukatab leaves more than his kitaba, each of them takes what remains to them of the kitaba, and what remains after that is divided equally between them. If the mukatab is unable to pay his kitaba fully and the one who did not allow him to defer his payment has exacted more than his associate did, the slave is still divided equally between them, and he does not return to his associates the excess of what he has exacted, because he only exacted his right with the permission of his associate. If one of them remits what is owed to him and then his associate exacts part of what he is owed by him and then the mukatab is unable to pay, he belongs to both of them. And the one who has exacted something does not return anything because he only demanded what he was owed. That is like the debt of two men in one writing against one man. One of them grants him time to pay and the other is greedy and exacts his due. Then the debtor goes bankrupt. The one who exacted his due does not have to return any of what he took."
| USC-MSA web (English) reference | : Book 39, Hadith 3 |
| Arabic reference | : Book 39, Hadith 1494 |
| Grade: | Maudu (fabricated) (Darussalam) |
| Reference | : Sunan Ibn Majah 2613 |
| In-book reference | : Book 20, Hadith 81 |
| English translation | : Vol. 3, Book 20, Hadith 2613 |